نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه فقه و حقوق، واحد لاهیجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، لاهیجان، ایران.
2 دانشیار، گروه فقه و حقوق، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.
3 استادیار، گروه فقه و حقوق، واحد لاهیجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، لاهیجان، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Although prosecuting criminals is one of the characteristics of a fair legal system, but from the perspective of utilitarianism and social expediency, sometimes it is necessary to abandon the aforementioned principle and turn to the principle of appropriateness of prosecution. Pursuing criminals is fair from a legal point of view and from a utilitarian and social point of view, it is directed towards the principle of the end of the pursuit. Adopting such a policy is closer to the goal of reforming the criminal and from the point of view of legal sociology, it is considered a step in the direction of avoiding labeling criminals. Therefore, the expiration of the prosecution and follow-up of the criminal is considered a chance factor in the society to avoid labeling the criminals. The above research on description and interpretation has studied the implementation of the principle of appropriateness of prosecution in the criminal system of Iran and other countries such as the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda and the military courts of Nuremberg and Tokyo. The results of the above research show that the policies of local proceedings, selection and priority, the interests of justice and the interests of expediency are the most important factors in judicial policies in the courts of the above countries. The difference between Iran's legal system and other countries is that in Iran's legal system, the principle of expiration is optional in most cases, while in the legal systems of the studied countries, it is mandatory.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)