نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 کارشناس ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد بینالمللی خلیج فارس، شهرستان خرمشهر، خرمشهر، ایران.
2 استادیار، واحد آبادان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آبادان، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The fight against money laundering is one of the most important challenges in the world today and various countries have enacted laws to combat it. Agreements have also been reached at the international level to combat money laundering. One of the most important issues is the correction of evidence in money laundering, which in this study examines the evolution of evidence in money laundering with an approach to international instruments of Iranian and British laws and regulations. In almost all legal systems, the issue of “reversing the burden of proof” in the crime of money laundering, the practical procedure is moving towards its acceptance and the burden of proving the lack of property acquisition in illegitimate ways is placed on the defendant. Although this issue seems incompatible with the principle of innocence at first glance, but considering that the reversal of the burden of proof in these cases is in line with the circumstances, there does not seem to be a conflict with the principle of innocence. Eventually, it became clear that merely detecting the company's mafia activity was sufficient to crack down on money laundering. In English law, changes in the principle of innocence in the field of money laundering are also recognized as the main motivator in the field of correction of reason.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)